SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Del) 254

J.D.JAIN
CHETAN LAL JAIN – Appellant
Versus
MANOHAR LAL VOHRA – Respondent


J. D. Jain, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision petition is directed against order of eviction passed by an Additional Rent Controller on 25th October, 1980 against the petitioner on the ground under clause (e) of proviso to Sub-section (1) of Section 14 of the Delhi Rent Control Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act ).

( 2 ) THE facts giving rise to this revision petition succinctly are that on 18th December 1979, the respondent-landlord (for short the landlord moved an application under clause (e) of proviso to Section 14 (1) read with Section 25-B of the Act for eviction of the petitioner (for short the tenant) from the demised premises comprised in house No. 123 (old No 122/11), Shankar Nagar, a trans-Yamuna colony. It was averred that the demised premises had been let to the tenant for residential purpose and were required by the landlord who was owner thereof for occupation as residence for himself and the members of his family dependent upon him and that the landlord had no other reasonably suitable residential accommodation with him. He explained that accommodation in his possession comprised three rooms and one store- cum-room but the same was absolutely inadequate and insufficient h






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top