SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Del) 15

S.B.WAD
HARBANS SINGH – Appellant
Versus
MINISTRY OF DEFENCE – Respondent


( 1 ) HELD, that the court Martial had become time barred under Section 122 of the Army Act is an irrelevant consideration for deciding whether it was practicable to hold an enquiry unless it is shown that the attempts were made in due deligence to institute court Martial proceedings within time. The word "impracticable" in Rule cannot be interpreted so as to destroy the express provision of the Principal Act under which Rules are framed.

( 2 ) THE object of section 122 is to ensure that the delingnet officer is not kept in suspense and uncertaninly for more than 3 years. The period of limitation is for benefit of the accused. But if the delingnet officer is ready to undergo a trial by Court Martial, I do not think that section 122 will come into play. Being only a statutory right, the same can be waived by the charged officer.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top