SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Del) 23

B.N.KIRPAL
RADHEY SHYAM KHANNA – Appellant
Versus
AMAR NATH KHANNA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sham Kishore, VIJAY GUPTA

B. N. Kirpal

( 1 ) ONE of the tenants has filed this appeal against the judgment and order dated 10th July, 1978 of the Rent Control Tribunal whereby the tribunal has dismissed the appeal against the order of eviction which has been passed by the Rent Controller, Delhi.

( 2 ) ONE Dropati Devi was the landlady of House No. 673 Katra Ned, Delhi. A portion of the house on the ground floor and on the second floor was let out to Radhey Shyam, appellant herein and Shyam Sunder. The landlady filed an application under Section 14 (1) (e) of the Rent Control Act for eviction of the tenants on the ground that she required the premises bona- fide for her own residence and for the residence of other members of her family dependent upon her and who had been living with her as members of one family. The members of the family referred to above included the landlady s two sons, namely, Prem Nath and Amar Nath and otheir respective families as well as a widow daughter-in-law of the landlady.

( 3 ) THE tenants contested the eviction petition. They denied that the landlady was the owner of the premises in question. They also denied that the premises were required bonafide by her. It was also contended










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top