SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Del) 26

CHARANJIT TALWAR
RAM NATH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.R.Sethi, S.S.Gautam

Charanjit Talwar, J,

( 1 ) THE petitioner herein, was convicted under Section 448 of the Indian Penal Code by a Metropolitan Magistrate by his order dated 16th October, 1980; and after affording an opportunity to him of being heard on the question of sentence he was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 1000. 00 , in default of payment he was directed to undergo rigorous imprisonment for four months. This order was passed on 21st October 1980 By this order, the learned Magistrate directed that out of the fine if deposited, Rs. 400. 00 be paid to the complainant. He also passed the direction under Section 456 of the Code of Criminal Procedure restoring the possession of the immovable property to the complaint Naki Devi.

( 2 ) THE appeal challenging the conviction and sentence was heard by Shri S. M. Aggarwal, Additional Sessions Judge, who, while passing the order of dismissal of the appeal, also upheld the order directing restoration of the property to the complainant.

( 3 ) SHRI D. R. Sethi, Learned Counsel for the petitioner, did not seriously challenge the concurrent findings of facts arrived at by the Courts below. The arguments before me were confined only to show that the directions












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top