CHARANJIT TALWAR
RAM NATH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent
( 1 ) THE petitioner herein, was convicted under Section 448 of the Indian Penal Code by a Metropolitan Magistrate by his order dated 16th October, 1980; and after affording an opportunity to him of being heard on the question of sentence he was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 1000. 00 , in default of payment he was directed to undergo rigorous imprisonment for four months. This order was passed on 21st October 1980 By this order, the learned Magistrate directed that out of the fine if deposited, Rs. 400. 00 be paid to the complainant. He also passed the direction under Section 456 of the Code of Criminal Procedure restoring the possession of the immovable property to the complaint Naki Devi.
( 2 ) THE appeal challenging the conviction and sentence was heard by Shri S. M. Aggarwal, Additional Sessions Judge, who, while passing the order of dismissal of the appeal, also upheld the order directing restoration of the property to the complainant.
( 3 ) SHRI D. R. Sethi, Learned Counsel for the petitioner, did not seriously challenge the concurrent findings of facts arrived at by the Courts below. The arguments before me were confined only to show that the directions
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.