SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Del) 38

AVADH BEHARI ROHATGI, LEELA SETH
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
SYED SHAH NASIR HUSSAIN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.P.VADHAVA, R.K.MAKHIJA

A. B. Rohatgi, J.

( 1 ) THIS Letters Patent Appeal arises out of a suit for permanent injunction brought by Sajjadaushin and mutawalli of Dargah Hazrat Sheikh Mohd. Chisti against the Union of India in 1959. The plaintiff s case was that there is a graveyard, well and trees attached to the dargah with an area of about 806/1/3 sq. yards which is a part of khasra No. 417. It was claimed by the plaintiff that be and his predecessor in interest have been in possession of the property for the last 300 years. The plaint recites about an old litigation. On November 5, 1938, the Governor-General-in Council brought a suit (Suit No. 463 of 1938) forpossessionofsbighas-8 biswas of this property against the plaintiff s grand father, Pir Karar Hussain.

( 2 ) IN that suit a decree was passed by consent of parties on March 1 1. 1939, which provided that a perpetual lease free of rent would be granted in favour of sajjadaiiashin and mutwali wilh respect to the dargah, mosque, graveyard and well. As regards the remainder of the land it was agreed that possession will be taken by the Governor General in Council. It is not disputed that the said decree was never executed. Nor was any document granted

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top