SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Del) 41

CHARANJIT TALWAR
VINOD ARORA – Appellant
Versus
MANJU ARORA – Respondent


Charanjit Talwar

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal against the order passed on 30. 7. 81 by Shri M. A. Khan, ADJ. declining the application of the husband appellant herein, u/s 14 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (the act ). It was held that the husband has not been able to make out any ground of exceptional hardship so as to entitle him to move the petition for dissolubefore the expiry of one year from the date of marriage.

( 2 ) INSPITE of service of "actual date notice of this appeal, respondent-wife has not appeared. I have heard Mr, Chug, counsel for the appellant, and with his assistance, gone through the record.

( 3 ) THE parties were married in accordance with the Hindu rites on 14. 3. 81. The husband s case is that after 3 days of the marriage, the wife refused to have any sexual intercource with him. His further grievance is that she remained absent from the matrimonial home without any reasonable cause or excuse. The working hours, of the wife, who is a teacher, are 8. 00 a. m. to 3. 00 p. m. but she invariably used to return home at about 7. 00 p. m. She refused to give any reagon to the husband for being late. In support of the averment that he was suffering exceptional hardshi



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top