CHARANJIT TALWAR
VINOD ARORA – Appellant
Versus
MANJU ARORA – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is an appeal against the order passed on 30. 7. 81 by Shri M. A. Khan, ADJ. declining the application of the husband appellant herein, u/s 14 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (the act ). It was held that the husband has not been able to make out any ground of exceptional hardship so as to entitle him to move the petition for dissolubefore the expiry of one year from the date of marriage.
( 2 ) INSPITE of service of "actual date notice of this appeal, respondent-wife has not appeared. I have heard Mr, Chug, counsel for the appellant, and with his assistance, gone through the record.
( 3 ) THE parties were married in accordance with the Hindu rites on 14. 3. 81. The husband s case is that after 3 days of the marriage, the wife refused to have any sexual intercource with him. His further grievance is that she remained absent from the matrimonial home without any reasonable cause or excuse. The working hours, of the wife, who is a teacher, are 8. 00 a. m. to 3. 00 p. m. but she invariably used to return home at about 7. 00 p. m. She refused to give any reagon to the husband for being late. In support of the averment that he was suffering exceptional hardshi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.