SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Del) 128

SULTAN SINGH
RAMESH CHAND SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
R. S. AGGARWAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.C.Mittal, MAEHSVAR DAYAL, S.L.Bhatia, Virender Mehta

SULTAN SINGH

( 1 ) THIS second appeal by the tenant under Section 39 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ) is directed against the judgment and order dated 30th October, 1980 of the Rent Control Tribunal confirming the order dated 11th March, 1980 of the Rent Controller passing an order of eviction against the appellant under Section 14 (l) (e) of the Act and holding further that if he deposits all arrea s of rent at Rs. 100 per month with effect from 1st January, 1976 within one month from the date of the order the appellant wotild be deemed to have availed the benefit under Section 14 (2) of the Act.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY the facts are R. S. Aggarwal, respondent on 19th January, 1979 filed an application for eviction of the appellant on the ground of non-payment of rent for the period from 1st June, 1970 at Rs. 100 per month in spite of notice of demand. The other ground of eviction was that the premises were let for residential purposes, the same were required by him for occupation for himself and for members of his family dependent on him, that he was the owner of the premises and that he had no other reasonably suitable residential accommodation. He











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top