SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Del) 182

SULTAN SINGH
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI – Appellant
Versus
VED PARKASH VIJ – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.D.Chawla, KADAMBRI, S.N.Sapra

Sultan Singh,j.

( 1 ) THIS second appeal under section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, as it stood prior to its amendment by Act 104 of 1976, challenges the judgment and decree of the Additional District Judge dated 3. 9. 76 affirming the judgment and decree dated 21. 12,74 of Subordinate Judge 1st Class whereby the suit of the plaintiff-respondent was decreed, restraining the appellant. Municipal Corporation of Dcihi from demolishing the structure of the disputed property raised by the plaintiff after getting the plan sanctioned.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY the facts are that the plaintiff is the owner of plot No. 41-B, Rajpur Road, Delhi. He applied to the appellant for sanction of a building plan for construction on the said plot which was sanctioned vide letter dated 13. 8. 68. and it was communicated to the plaintiff vide letter dated 20. 8. 68. The plaintiff constructed the building. He sent a notice in writing on 6. 9. 69 under section 31-6 of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 (hereinafter called the Act ) apd deposited necessary fees for obtaining a completion certificate to enable him to occupy the building. The plaintiff alleges that the officials of the Corporation visite









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top