SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Del) 229

SULTAN SINGH
SUBHASH CHANDER – Appellant
Versus
ARJAN KAUR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
DIPAK GUPTA, P.C.Mittal

Sultan Singh, J.

( 1 ) THE question for decision in this second appeal is : What is the effect of an order passed under section 15 (1) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") in an eviction petition if the tenant had already enjoyed the benefit under section 14 (2) of the Act in the previous eviction petition ?

( 2 ) BRIEFLY the facts are that the respondent-landlady filed a petition on 12th August, 1976 under section 14 (l) (a) of the Act claiming eviction of the appellant on the ground that he had failed to pay arrears of rent due from him for the period from 1st April, 1975 at Rs. 43. 00 per month inspite of notice of demand. After trial Shri M. A. Khan, Additional Rent Controller passed a conditional order of eviction dated 29th October, 1976 in case No. E-445 on 1976 against the appellant directing him to deposit all arrears of rent for the period from 1st April, 1975 at Rs. 43. 00 per month within one month from the date of the order and in case of such deposit he would be deemed to have enjoyed the benefit under Section 14 (2) of the Act and the eviction petition would stand dismissed. It is admitted by the partics that the appellant deposit



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top