SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Del) 248

D.R.KHANNA
USHA SALES LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
ARUNA GUPTA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ASHOK SHRIVASTAVA, L.R.GUPTA, P.K.AGRAWAL, YOGESHVAR PRASAD

D. R. Khanna, J.

( 1 ) AN important question which arises for determination is whether a lease granted in favour of a company with a stipulation that the demised premises is to be used for the residence of a particular employee of the company, and none other without the express approval of the landlord, permits the company to induct another employee for residence there when the former has left or ceased to reside there.

( 2 ) THIS has arisen in a lease granted by Mrs. Aruna Gupta in favour of M/s. Usha Sales Ltd. on 27th January 1981. One of the clauses agreed upon was as under :

"the accommodation will not be used for the residence of any other officer than Mr. L. L. Jain unless this has been agreed to by you" (the landlady ). It concerned the first floor of property bearing No. 99 Anand Lok, New Delhi ).

( 3 ) THERE is no dispute that L. L. Jain resigned from the service of Usha Sales Ltd. and relinquished charge on 5-5-1982. He thereafter left the rented premises and removed his house-hold articles. The telephone of the company however continued to be installed there. Some furniture provided by the company to the employee was also stated to be still there. The company then planne













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top