SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Del) 251

SULTAN SINGH
VINOD KUMAR BHALLA – Appellant
Versus
NANAKSINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.Malhotra, P.P.MALHOTRA, V.D.Pahuja

SULTAN SINGH

( 1 ) THE petitioner-tenant challenges the judgment and order of the Additional Rent Controller, Delhi dated 19th December, 1981 dismissing his application for leave to defend and passing an order of eviction under Section 14 (l) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ) against him.

( 2 ) THE respondent-landlord on 8th May, 1981 filed the eviction petition out of which this revision has arisen alleging that the petitioner was his tenant in two rooms, kitchen, bath and W. C. on Barsati floor at K-l/39, Model Town, Delhi on a monthly rent of Rs. 325. 00 , that he was, owner of the premises which were let for residential purposes that he required the premises bona fide for the residence of himself and his family members consisting of himself, his wife, one married son, daughter-in-law, one unmarried son aged 21 years, three daughters aged 19, 17 and 14 years respectively, besides a servant, that the unmarried son was of marriageable age. He further alleged that he had been in possession of the entire ground floor consisting of two bed rooms, one drawing-cum-dining room, store, kitchen and a temporary shed in the rear besides two bath r










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top