SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Del) 240

AVADH BEHARI ROHATGI
RAJINDER KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.R.Sethi, HARISH GULATI

Avadh Behari Rohatgi, J.

( 1 ) THESE are four appeals from the order of the Additional Sessions Judge dated 3. 9. 1980. This judgment will govern them all.

( 2 ) FOUR persons Rajinder Kumar, Balbir Singh, Rattan Lal and Joginder Lal were put on trial under sections 397/392/34 and Section 411 IPC. Joginder, Rajinder and Balbir were convicted for offences under sec. 392/34. The charge under Sec. 397 Indian Penal Code was dismissed against them. They were convicted and sentenced to R. I. for four years and a fine of Rs. 200. 00 each and in default R. I. for three months under sec. 392. 00 34 Indian Penal Code Rattan Lal was convicted under sec. 411 Indian Penal Code He was sentenced to RI for two years. From the order of the trial judge these four convicted persons appealed to this court against their sentence and conviction.

( 3 ) IT is a case of broad day light robbery. The facts are as follows. Uma Kapila, complainant was a lecturer in Miranda College. She was living with her husband Raj Kapila and her mother-in-law Parkash Wati in house No. 182, Tagore Park, New Delhi. Onf 29. 8. 74 these two women, Uma Kapila and Prakash Wati, were in their House. At about 2. 30 p. m. Prakash Wat
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top