SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Del) 247

D.R.KHANNA
RAM GOPAL SAWHNEY – Appellant
Versus
SURAJ BALRAM SAWHNEY AND SONS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.P.SHARMA, JAGDIP KISHORE, R.K.MAKHIJA, R.P.KAPUR

D. R. Khaonal

( 1 ) THESE are three sets of objections under Order 21 Rules 36 and 96 to 101 of the Code of Civil Procedure moved by three different objectors, who claim themselves to be tenants in separate portions of property bearing No. 5, Netaji Subhash Marg, New Delhi.

( 2 ) THE decree in the present case is based upon an award given by Shri P. N. Khanna, a retired Judge of this Court, who had acted as sole arbitrator between the family members of late Shri Suraj Balram Sawhney, for adjudicating disputes and differences inter-se them with regard to their joint properties, and effecting their partition. Suraj Balram had left behind two sons, namely, Krishan Gopal Sawhney and Ram Gopal Sawhney, and his widow Smt. Ram Piari Sawhney. The award dated 22-5-1978 was later made a rule of the Court on 14-3-1980.

( 3 ) THE present execution concerns property No. 5, Netaji Subhash Marg, New Delhi, which admittedly has fallen to the share of Krishan Gopal Sawhney. It is be an decree-holder of this property, who is seeking its possession. Initially he had sought actual possession of the second floor of this property in terms of the award which required him to pay Rs. 10,000. 00 to Ram Gopal






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top