SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Del) 285

SULTAN SINGH
KULDIP KAUR – Appellant
Versus
PRAKASH CHAND KHURANA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.L.Sachdev, M.S.Vohra

Sultan Singh,j.

( 1 ) SHRI Prakash Chand Khurana respondent mortgaged his property at plot No. 27, Rajindra Park, Pusa Road) New Delhi with Shri Harnam Singh Sachdev, for a sum of Rs. 22,000. 00 vide registered Mortgage Deed dated 17th January, 1970. The Mortgage Deed contained an arbitration clause. Disputes arose and therefore, Shri Harnam Singh Sachdev on 9th December, 1971 filed an application under section 20 of the Arbitration Act for reference of the disputes to the. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . named arbitrator. Shri Krishan Lal Dhall s/o. Shri Anant Ram Dhall, 5/39, W. E. A. Karol Bagh, New Delhi. The Court vide order dated 6th April, 1977 accepted the application and referred the matter to the said arbitrator. During the pendency of arbitration proceedings the time for making the award expired and applications were made from time to time under section 28 of the Arbitration Act for extension of time. Last such application was made on 15th March, 1979 and the Court extended time unto 30th November, 1979 for the making of the awar






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top