( 1 ) IN a suit for perpetual injunction filed on the 5th February, 1982 for restraining the defendants-respondent? from printing and publishing the threatened article and further restraining them from circulating for sale or otherwise the Magazine india Today containing the said article regarding the plaintiff, an application for temporary injunction under order 39 rules 1 and 2 of the code of civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the Code ) was allowed by the trial Court but on appeal it was dismissed by the lower Appellate Court. Hence, this revision. . . . . . . under Section 115 of the Code.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff-petitioner alleges that he is a citizen of India, that he is the Managing Director of Pure Drinks (New Delhi) Ltd. , that he was elected in 1980 as Member of Parliament and has very high status, associated with social, political, cultural and financial institutions, that defendant- respondent No. 7 india Today is a magazine of which defendant-respondent No. 1 is the Editor. Defendants-respondents 2 to 6 are the Managing Editor, Senior Editor, Correspondent and Publisher respectively of the magazine, that the defendants and vested interests we