SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Del) 325

D.K.KAPUR, S.RANGANATHAN
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
MEHTA TEJA SINGH AND COMPANY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
L.C.Goyal, U.L.VATVANI

S. Ranganathan

( 1 ) THERE is an appeal by the Union of India from the Judgment of a learned single Judge of this court (reported in AIR 1977 Del. 231) setting aside an arbitration award in so far as it directed the respondent, a firm of contractors (M/s. Mehta Teja Singh and Go.) to pay to the appellant (the Union of India) a sum of Rs. 14,674. 00.

( 2 ) THE respondent firm had executed a contract for the construction of an irrigation channel at Hissar. This involved, inter alia, rough excavation in any soil (ordinary or hard) getting out and removal of spoil to a distance not exceeding 440 yards all as specified" (vide item 4 of Schedule A to the contract ). For this item of work the contractual rate agreed upon was Rs. 4. 50 per cubic metre (as against a rate of Rs. 4. 24 mentioned in the standard specification rates: "ssr". for short ). When, at the end of the contract, the contractor firm claimed a sum of Rs. 12,782. 09 as due to it under the final bill, the Union, relying upon the report of a technical examiner made under Cl. 67 of the contract, claimed that the contractor had been overpaid to the extent of Rs. 50,478. 15 and that the Union was entitled to recover this amount















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top