SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Del) 16

J.D.JAIN
THERMOFRIZ,INSULATIONS PRIVATE LIMITED. ,CALCUTTA – Appellant
Versus
VIJAYA UDYOG – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ANUP SINGH, J.P.Gupta, MAN MOHAN SINGH

J. D. JAIN

( 1 ) THE facts leading to this application by the defendant succinctly are that the plaintiff-M/s. Thermofriz Insulations Private Limited instituted a suit for injunction, rendition of accounts and damages etc. , on the allegations that they were registered proprietors of the trade mark "thermofriz" under registration Number 283711/b in Class 19 in respect of non-metallic fibre boards tor use as building material for ceiling and panelling, that the same had been widely advertised having been written in a special style and the plaintiff had acquired a distinctive reputation because of the superiority of their goods. However, the defendant. Shri Mohan Rai trading as Vijay Udyog fraudulently and dishonestly adopted the trade mark THERMOFRI2 in order to gain undue advantage of the reputation of the plaintiff and started passing off his inferior goods as that of the plaintiff.

( 2 ) DURING the pendency of the suit, one Vinod Kumar Bhuwalka, sole proprietor of firm styled M/s. Vijay Chemicals moved an application under O. XXII Rule 10 read with Section 151 of the Civil P. C. (hereinafter referred to as the Code), being I. A. No. 1005/80, for substitution in place of the origin





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top