SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Del) 98

G.R.LUTHRA
VINOD KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.R.Sethi, P.P.GROVER

G. R. Luthra

( 1 ) THE present petition under Section 397 read with Sections 401 and 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the code) involves a question whether a prosecution witness in a criminal trial can be called upon to get his voice tape recorded for enabling an accused to get the same compared with an alleged tape recorded voice of the said witness.

( 2 ) PETITIONERS are facing trial in the court of a Metropolitan Magistrate, Delhi on the charges of alleged commission of offences of criminal house trespass of shop No. 835/1 Krishna Cloth Market, Chandni Chowk, Delhi belonging to Ganpat Ram of M/s. Laxmi Textiles, Chandni Ghowk, Delhi and theft of Cloth worth Rs. 4500. 00 belonging to said Ganpat Ram punishable under Sections 451, 341 and 380 read with Section 34 Indian Penal Code.

( 3 ) DURING the trial Shri Ram Chand Juneja (Public Witness 6) appeared as a witness for the prosecution. During cross-examination a suggestion was put to the wilness to the effect that he had admitted before the petitioners that he had not seen anything about the occurrence and that he was appearing as a witness under pressure of Ganpat Ram. Witness denied that suggesti











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top