( 1 ) A petition under Section 14 (l) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act for eviction of the tenant, S. K. Sen, from premises constituting of first floor of X-6, Hauz Khas, New Delhi, was brought by the owner-landlady Smt. Kunwarani Chandra Kunwar, pleading that she bona fide required the same for her residence. The tenant contested the petition and sought permission to defend which was granted. Later, however, the ejectment was allowed by Shri J. D. Kapur, Rent Controller, Delhi, after considering the evidence which both the sides had led. The tenant now feeling aggrieved has moved the present revision before this Court.

( 2 ) I have heard both the sides and considered the entire evidence on record. In my opinion, no interference is called for in the assessment of evidence by the learned Rent Controller. He has some to the conclusion that the landlady is the owner of the premises, and has no suitable accommodation in her possession and further that she, in fact, bona fide requires the premises for her family s residence. These are essentially factual appraisements, and I do not see any legal implications involved in them which should justify interference in the revi