SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Del) 241

O.N.VOHRA, RAJINDAR SACHAR
PREMIER TYRES LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
STATE TRADING CORPORATION – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.Tandon, A.N.PAREKH, D.S.DANG, S.N.KACKAR, S.S.RAY

Sachar

( 1 ) WHAT sanctity and effectiveness is to be attached to the Bank guarantees which are also called performance guarantees is the question that calls for decision in this appeal?

( 2 ) THIS is an appeal against the order of the learned single judge by which he refused the application for the appellant for interim injunction (arising out of a suit filed by appellant) restraining the respondent from realising any amout in pursuance of the bank guarantee dated 6. 3. 1979 furnished to it by the appellant from the Bank of India.

( 3 ) THE plaintiff is a manufacturer of tyres. One of the raw materials which is used in the manufacture of tyres is natural rubber. The import of natural rubber is canalised through respondent. For their requirements the appellant entered into an agreement with the respondent for the supply by the respondent of 360 MT of SMR-20 quality of natural rubber Alongwith the registration application a bank guarantee from the Bank of India for Rs. 3. 6 lakhas was furnished which was calculated Rs. 1,000/ per MT for the quantity indented. By clause 10 (viii) of the Conditions of allotment the appellant had agreed to make payment for goods allotted and for taking t





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top