High Court Of Delhi
AMAR PARKASH SHARMA - Appellant
Versus
PARKASHWATI, ETC - Respondent
First Appeal Order 235 of 1979
Decided On : 09/14/1981
SUCCESSION CERTIFICATE - MARRIAGE - PROOF - PRESUMPTION - LEGITIMACY - HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955 - SECTION 16 - INTERPRETATION - SUCCESSION CERTIFICATE ACT, 1988 - SECTION 37 - INTERPRETATION - EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 - SECTION 32(5) - INTERPRETATION.
Fact of the Case:
The appellants, Amar Parkash Sharma and his sister Amar Devi, challenged the grant of Succession Certificate to Kumari Seema, minor through her mother and natural guardian Smt. Parkash Wati, in respect of the debts and securities of the deceased Ram Parkash Sharma. They also challenged the order refusing to grant the Succession Certificate to Amar Parkash Sharma.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that Parkash Wati was lawfully married to the deceased in April 1954 and Kumari Seema was their daughter. The court further held that Parkash Wati and Kumari Seema were entitled to inherit the estate of the deceased in preference to Amar Parkash Sharma, appellant who was brother of the deceased.
Issues: 1. Whether Parkash Wati was the legally wedded wife of Ram Parkash Sharma, deceased? 2. Whether Kumari Seema was the legitimate daughter of Ram Parkash Sharma, deceased? 3. Whether Parkash Wati and Kumari Seema were entitled to the grant of Succession Certificate?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that the evidence on record conclusively established that Ram Parkash Sharma, deceased and Parkash Wati were lawfully married and that since the date of marriage they lived together as husband and wife at 33, Aram Bagh Lane, New Delhi. 2. The court held that Kumari Seema was the legitimate daughter of Ram Parkash Sharma, deceased and Parkash Wati. 3. The court held that Parkash Wati and Kumari Seema were entitled to inherit the estate of the deceased in preference to Amar Parkash Sharma, appellant who was brother of the deceased.
Final Decision: The court modified the order of the trial court and held that Parkash Wati and Kumari Seema widow and daughter of the deceased were entitled to the grant of a Succession Certificate with respect of the debts and securities of the deceased mentioned in their application for the grant of Succession Certificate. The trial court was accordingly directed to issue Succession Certificate to them in accordance with law. The petition for the grant of Succession Certificate by the appellants was dismissed.
( 1 ) THE appellants, Amar Parkash Sharma and his sister Amar Devi chaillenge the judgment and order of the trial court granting Succession Certificate to Kumari Seema minor through her mother and natural guardian Smt. Parkash Wati in respect of the debts and securities of the deceased Ram Parkash Sharma. They also challenge the order refusing to grant the Succession Certificate to Amar Parkash Sharma, appellant in F. A. O. No. 236 of 1979. The brief facts arc as under :
( 2 ) RAM Parkash Sharma died on 9th January, 1976. His widow Smt. Chanan Devi an insane through her next friend Amar Parkash Sharma (appellant) on 17th February, 1976 filed an application for the grant of Succession Certificate in respect of debts and securities left by the deceased. On 23rd February, 1976 Parkashwati alleging herself to be the widow of the deceased and Kumari Seema minor daughter of the deceased filed another application for the grant of Succession Certificate. Chanan Devi widow unfortunately died on 29th. July, 1977 and therefore her application for the grant of Succession Certificate lapsed. Amar Parkash Sharma, appellant on 20th August, 1977 therefore filed another application for the grant of Succession Certificate to him. All these proceedings were consolidated. Parties filed their respective objections in the applications for the grant of Succession Certificate. It is admitted that Amar Parkash Sharma is the brother of the deceased. The disputes are : Whether Parkash Wati is the widow of the deceased, and Kumari Seema is his minor daughter. The trial court by its judgment and order dated 21st November, 1978 granted Succestion Certificate to Kumari Seema holding her to be the illegitimate minor daughter of the deceased. This certificate was granted through her mother and natural guardian Smt. Parkash Wati. The application for the grant of Succession Certificate by Amar Parkash Sharma was dismissed. The trial court has held that Parkash Wati has not been able to prove that she is the legally wedded wife of Ram Parkash Sharma, deceased.
( 3 ) LEARNED counsel for the appellants submits that Kumari Seema is not entitled to the grant of, Succession Certificate. He says that she is not the illegitimate daughter of the deceased, under Section 16 of the Hindu Marriage Act. Learned counsel for the respondents, namely, Parkash Wati arid Kumari Seema however, challenges the finding of the trial court that Parkash Wati was not the legally wedded wife of the deceased. He submits that she was legally wedded wife and Kumari Seema was their legitimate daughter. In other words, he claims the. grant of the Succession Certificate in favour of both Parkash Wati (widow) and Kumari Seema (daughter ). Counsel for the appellants further says that Parkash Wati is not the widow of the deceased and that Amar Parkash Sharma appellant is entitled to the grant of the Succession Certificate.
( 4 ) THE first question for decision therefore is : Whether Parkash Wati is the legally wedded wife of Ram Parkash Sharma deceased ? The trial court has observed that Parkash Wati has failed to prove the ceremonies of the marriage and therefore. it held that she is not the legally wedded wife of the deceassed. This finding is contrary to the evidence on record. The evidence led by the appellants is to the effect that they never witnessed the marriage between the deceased and Parkash Wati. Some of the witnesses on behalf of the appellants have deposed that they never saw the two living together. Parkash Wati is the daughter of Kishan Singh, a Government servant who used to reside at 30, Aram Bagh Lane, New Delhi. Ram Parkash Sharma, deceased used to reside at 33, Aram Bagh Lane, New Delhi. Various witnesses from the locality lave deposed about the factum of marriage between the two in April, 1954. Balwant Singh, O. W. 3 deposes that Chanan Devi first wife of the deccased was his sister, that she became insane after her marriage, that the deceased expressed his des
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.