SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Del) 274

B.N.KIRPAL
B. K. BALI – Appellant
Versus
SANT LAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.C.Kalra, V.K.Makhija

B. N. Kirpal, J.

( 1 ) THE short but important question which arises in this Civil Revision is with regard to the service of the summons under the Provisions of Section 25-B of the Delhi Rent Control Act.

( 2 ) THE respondents (herein referred to as the landlords) filed an application under Section 14 for the eviction of the petitioner (hereinafter referred to as the tenant ). This application was filed on 24th January, !979 under Section l4 (l) (e) read with Section 25-B of the said Act.

( 3 ) ON the application for ejectment having been filed the trial court directed the issue of summons by ordinary process as well as by registered post. It appears that a number of attempts were made but service could not be effected on the tenant. On an application being filed under Order 5 Rule 20, C. P. C. the trial court on 27th November, 1979 ordered that the stmmons be published in janyug . This publication was effected on 29th December, 1979. On the next date of hearing i. e. on 13th February, 1980 the tenant appeared in court. It was noted by the trial court in the order that the counsel for the tenant accepted service from today. A copy of the application under Section l4 (l) (e) was gi









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top