SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Del) 329

SULTAN SINGH
SUSHMA KHANNA – Appellant
Versus
SURESH KHANNA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.AHLAVAT, C.M.OBEROI, V.K.Agnihotri

Sultan Singh

( 1 ) THIS petition u/s 115, CPC, is directed against the order of the ADJ, Delhi, dt. 1. 12. 80 directing the husband to pay a sum of Rs. 1000. 00 as litigation expenses to the wife and Rs. 450. 00 p. m. as maintenance for her support w. e. f. 30. 9. 80, the date when she made an application u/s 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act ( the Act ) in proceedings for divorce u/s 13 of the Act.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated the facts are that the marriage between the parties was solemnised according to Hindu rites at Delhi on 27. 1. 79. They lived together at Madras. The respondent is employed in I. T. C. Hotels. Previously the was posted at Hotel Chola, Madras but now the is posted at Jammu in Asia Hotel. The wife in her application u/s 24 of the Act, alleges that she has been in possession of few Share certificates of the value of Rs 2000. 00 and that she has no other source of income. She has claimed Rs. 5000. 00 as litigation expenses and Rs. 2000. 00 per month as maintenance. The trial court has held that the wife is not in a position to support herself and that her income from the share certificates is Rs. 100. 00 or Rs. 150. 00p. a. and she has no other source of income. As regards th






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top