( 1 ) THIS civil revision under Section 25b (8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act ii directed against the order of the Rent Controller dated 27th September, 1980 whereby the petitioner-tenant was granted leave to defend the eviction application to a limited extent. The learned counsel for petitioner submits that he is entitled to be granted leave to defend on all the points. The learned counsel for respondents raises preliminary objection that revision against an interlocutory order passed under Sectn 25b of the Act is not maintainable under Section 25b (8) of the Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner however, submits that every order passed by the Controller under Section 25b of the Act is revisable within the meaning sub-section (8) of Section 25b of the Act. He relies upon Vinod Kumar Chowdhry v. Smt. Narain Devi Taneja, AIR1980 SC 2012 = 1980 DRJ 15. In the case before the Supreme Court the landlord s application for eviction was dismissed by the Controller. The landlord filed a revision in this Court and tenant submitted that the order dismissing the eviction application was appealable and not revisable but it was held by this Court that the remedy of the la