SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Del) 38

M.L.JAIN
R. BUDHAWAR – Appellant
Versus
MAHARAJ KUMAR M. SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.S.Vohra, MUKUL ROHTAGI

M. L. Jain

( 1 ) THE respondent is the landlord and the petitioner is the tenant. The house is three storeyed- The ground floor is occupied by the landlord himself while the first floor and Barsati in the second floor are let out to the petitioner. The premises were initially let out to M/s Bagai Motors which was dissolved in the year 1972. In 1973 the petitioner became the direct renant. The landlord sought eviction of the petitioner on the ground of personal bona fide requirement under section 15 (1) (e) the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958. He stated that he belongs to the the princely family of Registhan and to begin with his family comprised himself, wife, a child and 3 servants Besides his mother and grand-mother and his parents-in-law also visit him off and on. Later on one more child was born to him. He, therefore, found the accommodation in his possession to be insufficient which comprised only two bed rooms and one drawing cum-dining room one servant quarter besides kitchen etc. The petitioner did not examine herself nor produced any evidence in spite of several opportunities The learned Rent Coatrollar found that the need of the respondent was genuine and he decreed eviction.




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top