SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Del) 91

AVADH BEHARI ROHATGI
PRITHVI RAJ – Appellant
Versus
NIRMAL MULTANI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.R.Gupta, RAJ KISHAN, S.N.CHOPRA

A. B. Rohatgi, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal from the order of the rentcontrol tribunal dated 2/11/1979.

( 2 ). The appellant Prithvi Raj is a tenant on the ground floor ofhouse No. 66 Babar Road, New Delhi. He carries on business of sale ofbooks under the name and style of Hind Book House. On 15/04/1968 hetook the premises on rent from the landlady, Nirmal Multani, the respondent. A lease deed was executed. The rate of rent was agreed atrs. 750. 00per month. The tenant paid advance rent of 6 months. In terms of thelease deed the premises let to the tenant consisted of the ground floor hall. In additional to this he was given the right to keep a shop window 6 x 9 feetin the front verandah for display of books. He was also allowed to put asign board on the common wall. But it was expressly provided in the leasethat front room, verandah, bath room and front court yard shall not formpart of the demised premises. The tenant however was given the right ofpassage from the front and use of the verandah for the limited purpose ofkeeping a show window of 6x9 feet.

( 3 ). Though the lease was for a period of 11 months with an option tothe tenant to extend it for a further period of three years









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top