SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Del) 102

G.R.LUTHRA
STATE – Appellant
Versus
JITENDER CHOPRA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.K.Sud, P.P.GROVER

G. R. Luthra, J.

( 1 ) THE present petition under Section 439 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in short the Code) is for cancellation of bail of Jitender Chopra and Man Mohan Chopra respondents granted to them on 1st September, 1979 by Shri N. C. Goel, Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi. According to the prosecution respondents had committed an offence of murder by causing the death of Smt. Kanchan Chopra by burning punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 Indian Penal Code.

( 2 ) SMT. Kanchan Ghopra was daughter of Shri Madan Lal Bedi. She was employed as a Stenographer in the office of Union Public Service Commission. She was married to Jitender Chopra respondent on February 9, 1978. Out of the wed-lock a child was born. Respondent No. 2 Man Mohan Ghopra is father of Jitender and father-in-law of Kanchan deceased.

( 3 ) RELATIONS between Jitender and Kanchan were strained. The version of the prosecution is that both the respondents were dowry hungry and that on account of ever unsatisfied greed they were forcing Kanchan to bring money from her parents from time to time.

( 4 ) ON 27thjune, 1979, as usual, Kanchan went from her matrimonial home to her office in the Uni





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top