SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Del) 143

V.S.DESHPANDE, B.N.KIRPAL
TEJPAL SLNGH – Appellant
Versus
HARDIT SINGH, ETC – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.L.ITORORA, MUKUL ROHTAGI, R.S.NARULA, RAJU RAMACHANDRAN, S.GANESH RAO, SOLI J.SORABJI

V. S. DESHPANDE, J. (Oral)

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal under section 10 (1) of the Delhi High Court Act, 1966, read with Rule 103 of Order 21 and section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure (the Code), as amended in 1976. It is against the order of a learned single Judge passed on the original side in execution proceedings. The decree- holder respondent sought to execute the decree in execution case No. 40 of 1979. The decree was based on a compromise between the decree-holder, Hardit Singh, and the judgment-debtor, Daljeet Singh. It provided for the judgment-debtor handing over possession of the premises to the decree-holder. When the decree-holder sought to obtain possession of the premises by way of executing the decree, he was obstructed by Tej Pal Singh, the present appellant who came into the possession of the premises as a result of an agreement between him and the judgment-debtor after the decree against the judgment- debtor was passed.

( 2 ) THE decree-holder made an application complaining of the obstruction by the objector to which the objector filed a reply raising various pleas and the decree could not be executed against him. Some of the basic objections were dismissed by th



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top