SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Del) 193

B.N.KIRPAL, PRAKASH NARAIN
D. P. MAHESHWARI – Appellant
Versus
DELHI ADMINISTRATION – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.Gupta, S.N.BHANDARI

B. N. Kirpal, J.

( 1 ) THE appellant was appointed by M/s. Toshniwal Brothers Private Limited (hereinafter referred,as the. respondent-company) as an Accounts Officer in August, 1964. The salary of the appellant was fixed at Rs. 600. 00 in the grade of Rs. 600-50-800. The appointment had been made pursuant, to an application dated 26th. March, 1964 submitted by the appellant. In the said application the appellant had described himself as M. Corn, LL, B. with special proficiency in Company Accounts and Audit, Income-tax law, statistics, organization, business marnagement etc. In April, 1965 the appellant was designated as an officer oh special duty. In 1966 he was transferred on deputation as Secretary to the Industrial Service Bureau, a service of consultancy organisation in which the Joiat Managing Director of the respondent-company was interested. In the year 1968 the appellant was appointed as Stores Purchase Officer. He was also required to look after the legal department and was to draw a salary of Rs.-800. 00 per month.

( 2 ) THE appellant was transferred to Madras as Administrative Officer in August, 1969. His services were terminated on July 28, 1969 allegedly on the ground
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top