SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Del) 177

CHARANJIT TALWAR, PRITHVI RAJ
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Appellant
Versus
GANGA SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Keshav Dayal, R.DAYAL, RAM PAUL, S.P.Attri

Prithviraj

( 1 ) RESPONDENT, S. Ganga Singh, was prosecuted under S. 29 (2) read with section 14 of the Delhi Development Act, 1957 (hereinafter called the Act ) on a complaint filed by the appellant, Delhi Development Authority, on the allegation that he on or about 19th September 1964, had permitted the ground floor and Ist floor of the building bearing No. H-89, Ring Road, N. D. S. E.-1 for the purpose of running office of various concerns, namely, Gupta Property Dealers, Navyug Property Dealers and Cirugia Delux Pvt. Ltd. , in the contravention of the Master Plan of Delhi and Section 14 of the Act.

( 2 ) THE Trial Court by its impugned judgment dated 28th October, 1975, acquitted Ganga Singh by giving him benefit of doubt holding that the prosecution had not conclusively proved the case against him.

( 3 ) THE Delhi Development Authority (hereinafter called the authority ) has filed the present appeal feeling aggrieved by the above-said judg- ment.

( 4 ) BRIEF facts of the case arc as follows. Harish Chander Tulsiani, Sectional Officer of the Authority visited premises bearing No. H-89, N. D. S. E. Part I, New Delhi, on 30th October, 1968, and found that three concerns of prop



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top