SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Del) 183

SULTAN SINGH
D. N. VOHRA – Appellant
Versus
AGYA WANTI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.P.CHOPRA, Rajinder Mathur, V.B.ANDLEY

Sultan Singh, J.

( 1 ) SMT. Agyawanti, respondent is the landlord ofquarter No. 3 Block No. 1, Lajpat Nagar-1, New Delhi. She let out tworooms, Verandah, Kitchen, bath room and open space on ground floor tod. N. Vohra, Appellant for a fixed period of 22 months with effect from 17/07/1976 for residential purposes after obtaing permission dated 15/07/1976of the Controller, under section 21 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter called the Act ). The appellant executed the lease deed dated 19/07/1976 in terms of the permission but did not vacate the premises onthe expiry of the said period. An execution application was filed for obtainingpossession. The appellant filed objections which were dismissed on 12/10/1979 and his appeal was also dismissed by the Rent Control Tribunal videorder dated 21/02/1980. We has come up in second appeal under s. 39of the Act.

( 2 ) IN his objections the appellant pleads that in October 1969 theentire ground floor consisting of three rooms, kitchen, latrine and bath roomwas let out to him at a monthly rent of Rs. 260/. In 1972 the husband ofthe respondent was seriously ill and he was not in a position to climb thestairs. On respondent s reque




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top