SULTAN SINGH
KUNDAN LAL MEHTA,SATISH KUMAR MEHTA,SURESH KUMAR MEHTA,VIJAY KUMAR MEHTA,SUMAN KUMARI MEHTA,ROSHAN LAL – Appellant
Versus
PRAKASH WATI W/O. R. N. CHADHA – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is tenant s appeal under Section 39 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter called "the Act") against the judgment and order of the Rent Control Tribunal dated 26th April, 1979 by which it accepted the landlady s appeal from the order of the Additional Controller dated 10/2/1975 and passed an order of eviction against the appellants. The landlady-respondent brought an eviction petition on grounds mentioned in clauses (a), (e) and (b) of the proviso to Sub-section (1) of Section 14 of the Act. The Additional Controller dismissed the eviction petition. The landlady filed an appeal before the Tribunal. The order of the Controller was set aside and an eviction order undersection 14 (1) (e) of the Act was passed on 26th April, 1979. The learned counsel for the appellants raises three questions in this appeal: 1. The eviction application does not disclose any cause of action.
( 2 ) THE premises were not let for residential purposes but were let and used both for residential and commercial purposes.
( 3 ) THE landlady does not require bonafide the demised premises and she has suitable accommodation on first floor. The learned counsel for the landlady i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.