SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Del) 207

AVADH BEHARI ROHATGI, S.B.WAD
NOORUDDIN – Appellant
Versus
CHAUDHARY NAUBAT SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.R.SAINI, C.M.CHOPRA

AVADH BEHARI ROHATGI, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a letters patent appeal from the order of a learned single judge dated March 3, 1972.

( 2 ) THESE are the facts. On May 13, 1964, Chaudhary Naubat Singh, the plaintiff (the present respondent) instituted a suit for a declaration and injunction against five persons. These were : (1) Allahwala Arhti, (2) Noor Uddin son of Allahwala, (3) Ziauddin son of Allahwala, (4) Mohd. Muslim, and (5) Shri Kantoo. In the plaint the plaintiff alleged that the defendants were tenants of two shops near his shop and that they were obstructing his vehicles and carts from carrying goods and vegetables to his shop. He claimed a declaration that he, his servants, his carts and vehicles had a right to use the passage for going to the shop as an easement of necessity. He claimed a mandatory injunction directing the defendants to remove stone blocks which they had placed to create obstruction in the free movement and passage to the shop of the plaintiff. He also asked for a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from obstructing him in the use of the passage. The portion which was claimed as an easement of a necessity was shown in the plan.

( 3 ) THE suit was



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top