SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Del) 366

PRAKASH NARAIN, S.RANGANATHAN
JAY ENGINIRING WORKS LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.N.HAKSAR, RAVNDER NARAIN, S.N.Sapra, T.A.ANSARI

S. RANGANATHAN

( 1 ) JAY Engineering Works Limited (petitioner No. 1) is a limited company having its registered office at Delhi. It owns a unit in Agra known as Agra Engineering Industries where it manufactures electric fans and regulators. According to the petitioner it is also manufacturing regulators for the fans at its Agra unit but it is stated by the respondents in the counter affidavit that the regulators are not manufactured by the petitioner but that the petitioner gets them manufactured from a unit named and styled as Bharat Kumar Bhargava by supplying them requisite raw-material. The electric fans and regulators are sold by the petitioner company to dealers appointed by it and also directly to customers from its own shops in the State of West Bengal and Andaman and Nicobar Islands. In respect of the rest of the country, however, about 90 per cent of its sales are effected to Usha Sales Limited (hereinafter referred to as "usha") and to some extent directly to bulk institutional buyers.

( 2 ) WE are concerned in this writ petition with the determination of the assessable value of the electric fans manufactured and sold by the petitioner for purposes of the Central Excise




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top