S.RANGANATHAN, PRAKASH NARAIN
JASWANT SUGAR MILLS LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
( 1 ) THE only question which arises for determination in this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is the construction to be placed on a proviso contained in a notification issued by the Central Government bearing No. 13/65 of February 13, 1965 under the power conferred by sub-rule (1) of Rule 8 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. This notification was, admittedly, issued with a view to give incentive to the production of sugar in our country. The notification was issued exempting sugar in column 2 of the table therein falling under sub-item (1) of the first Schedule of the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 from certain duty leviable thereon as was in excess of the duty specified in column 3 of the said table. In plain language, for production of sugar over and above a certain quantity the manufacturer was entitled to certain rebate.
( 2 ) THE petitioner is a public limited company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act. Its business is to manufacture and sell sugar: The petitioner manufactures sugar in its factory situated at Meerut.
( 3 ) THERE is a sugar factory known as S. B. Sugar Mill at Bijnor. It was originally owned by a. partnership
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.