SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Del) 296

S.RANGANATHAN, PRAKASH NARAIN
JASWANT SUGAR MILLS LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.L.CHAUDHRY, L.C.Goyal, VED VYAS

PRAKASH NARAIN

( 1 ) THE only question which arises for determination in this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is the construction to be placed on a proviso contained in a notification issued by the Central Government bearing No. 13/65 of February 13, 1965 under the power conferred by sub-rule (1) of Rule 8 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. This notification was, admittedly, issued with a view to give incentive to the production of sugar in our country. The notification was issued exempting sugar in column 2 of the table therein falling under sub-item (1) of the first Schedule of the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 from certain duty leviable thereon as was in excess of the duty specified in column 3 of the said table. In plain language, for production of sugar over and above a certain quantity the manufacturer was entitled to certain rebate.

( 2 ) THE petitioner is a public limited company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act. Its business is to manufacture and sell sugar: The petitioner manufactures sugar in its factory situated at Meerut.

( 3 ) THERE is a sugar factory known as S. B. Sugar Mill at Bijnor. It was originally owned by a. partnership














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top