High Court Of Delhi
KARTAR SINGH - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI - Respondent
CRIMINAL APPEAL 128 of 1980
Decided On : 10/16/1980
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE, 1973 - SECTION 210 - COMPLAINT CASE AND POLICE INVESTIGATION - PROCEDURE TO BE FOLLOWED - SECTION 210 APPLIES ONLY WHEN THE MAGISTRATE IS HOLDING AN INQUIRY OR A TRIAL IN RELATION TO A COMPLAINT CASE AND IT IS BROUGHT TO HIS NOTICE THAT THE OFFENCE WHICH FORMS THE SUBJECT-MATTER OF THAT INQUIRY OR TRIAL IS UNDER INVESTIGATION WITH THE POLICE.
Fact of the Case:
A complaint was filed against Avtar Singh and Kartar Singh for the murder of Gurmeet. The police had already submitted a challan against Ranjit Kaur, the mother-in-law of the deceased, for the same offence. The Magistrate committed Ranjit Kaur to the Court of Session. The complainant then filed a revision petition seeking to have Avtar Singh and Kartar Singh also committed to the Court of Session along with Ranjit Kaur.
Finding of the Court:
The Additional Sessions Judge allowed the revision petition and directed the Magistrate to commit Avtar Singh and Kartar Singh to the Court of Session. The Magistrate challenged this order in a revision petition before the High Court.
Issues: Whether Section 210 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 applies to a case where the police have already submitted a challan against some of the accused and a complaint is filed against other accused for the same offence.
Ratio Decidendi: Section 210 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 applies only when the Magistrate is holding an inquiry or a trial in relation to a complaint case and it is brought to his notice that the offence which forms the subject-matter of that inquiry or trial is under investigation with the police. In such circumstances, the Magistrate stays the proceedings in the complaint case and awaits the result of the investigation. If the police report does not relate to any person accused in the complaint case or if he does not take cognizance of any offence on the police report, the inquiry or trial stayed by him gets going again in accordance with the provisions of the Code. On the other hand, if the Magistrate takes cognizance of any offence on the police report submitted in due course against any person who is accused in the complaint case also he has to inquire into or try the complaint and the police cases together and the procedure to be followed is that applicable to cases instituted on police report.
Final Decision: The High Court allowed the revision petition filed by the Magistrate and set aside the order of the Additional Sessions Judge. The Magistrate was directed to hold his inquiry expeditiously so that in the event of his committing Avtar Singh or Kartar Singh or both to the Court of Session, the person/persons committed by him in the complaint case may be tried by the Sessions Court along with Ranjit Kaur.
( 1 ) ON the death of Mrs. Gurmeet wife of Avtar Singh, a case under Section 302 Indian Penal Code. was registered at Police Station Gandhi Nagar, Delhi, and on completion of the investigation a charge-sheet for trial under the said provision of law was put up against Ranjit Kaur wife of Kartar Singh and mother-in-law of the deceased. Later on, Mohan Singh lodged a complaint in the Court of Metropolitan Magistrate Shahdara and attributed the murder of Gurmeet to Avtar Singh and Kartar Singh aforesaid, apart from Ranjit Kaur. This complaint was instituted on 9. 5. 1979 and on 19-5-1979 Magistrate committed Ranjit Kaur alone to the Court of Session. It was represented to Shri R. L. Chugh, Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Shahdara, with whom the complaint mentioned above was pending that in view of the dictates of Section 2100 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 the two persons other than Ranjit Kaur accused in the complaint be also committed to the Court of Session so that the police case and the complaint case can be tried together. The plea was, however, rejected by the Magistrate and it was directed that the complaint be enquired into in the manner prescribed by Chapter XV of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The complainant Mohan Singh filed a revision petition against this order and the Additional Sessions Judge concluded that Section 210 (2) being applicable to the matter, the complaint case should have been treated as if the same had been instituted on a police report and committed together with the police case. Consequently he set aside the impugned order and remanded the complaint case for further proceedings according to law in the light of the observations made by him. On receipt of that order the Magistrate directed on 27. 2. 1980 issue of non-bailable warrants for the appearance of Avtar Singh and Kartar Singh. Aggrieved by this action, Kartar Singh and Avtar Singh have filed the revision petition under consideration for the order of the Additional Sessions Judge being set aside and the proceedings pending against them being quashed.
( 2 ) I may quote Section 210 of the Code of Criminal Procedure here for the ease of reference :
"210. Procedure to be followed when there is a complaint case and police investigation in respect of the same offence. (1) When in a case instituted otherwise than on a police report (hereinafter referred to as a complaint case), it is made to appear to the Magistrate, during the course of the inquiry or trial held by him, that an investigation by the police is in progress in relation to the offence which is the subject-matter of the inquiry or trial held by him, the Magistrate shall stay the proceedings of such inquiry or trial and call for a report on the matter from the police officer of conducting the investigation. (2) If a report is made by the investigating police officer under Section 173 and on such report cognizance of any offence is taken by the Magistrate against any person who is an accused in the complaint case, the Magistrate shall inquire into or try together the complaint case and the case arising out of the police report as if both the cases were instituted on a police report. (3) If the police report does not relate to any accused in the complaint case or if the Magistrate does not take cognizance of any offence on the police report, he shall proceed with the inquiry or trial, which was stayed by him, in accordance with the provisions of this Code. "
( 3 ) IT is evident from the clear language of the aforesaid section that it comes into operation when the Magistrate is holding an inquiry or a trial in relation to a complaint case and it is brought to his notice that the offence which forms the subject-matter of that inquiry or trial is under investigation with the police. In such circumstances the Magistrate stays the proceedings in the complaint case and awaits the result of the investigation. If the police report does not relate to any person accu
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.