SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Del) 273

D.R.KHANNA
BRAMEC SURI PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
SURI SMITH CHEM – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Anita Bahri, D.P.SHARMA, S.L.Bhatia

D. R. Khanna

( 1 ) THIS suit under order 37 of the C. P. C. has been brought by the Bramec Suri Pvt. Ltd. for the recovery of Rs. 70,000. 00 together with interest amounting to Rs. 8,18426. at 18% per annum It is based upon three Hundies dated 30. 3. 1978, executed by the defendants in plaintiff s favour. Two of them were of Rs, 30,000. 00 each and third of Rs. 10,000. 00 First was payable by 150 days from the date of execution, the second by 180 days and the third by 210 days.

( 2 ) THE averments are that the plaintiff is engaged in the business of manufacture and sale of brake linings, clutch facings and other types of friction materials. For the purpose of effecting sales within the territory of eastern India, defendant No. 1 company was appointed as plaintiff s agent with liabilities to secure orders, ensure payments in respect of supplies made and to collect Candd Forms under the Central Sales Tax Act. On compliance, the defendant company was entitled to payment of commission at the agreed rate.

( 3 ) APART from the agency business, defendant No. 1 also effected direct purchases from the plaintiff of goods for selling them in open market. On such purchases discount was allowed














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top