SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Del) 317

M.L.JAIN
SURESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.C.MATHUR, F.Anthony, Kamlesh Kumar, M.L.SHRIVASTAV, N.K.PARMAR, O.P.Soni

M. L. JAIN, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a petition moved by the complainantsuresh Kumar under sub-section (6) of s. 407 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for transfer of the case State v. Om Pal Singhand others, under Ss. 364, 365, 342, 506, T. P. C. , from the court ofshri P. K. Bahri, Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, to some other competentcourt.

( 2 ) UPON an F. I. R. lodged with the A. C. Police (Crime) on 21/08/1978, at 10. 45 P. M. , a case was instituted against the accusedrespondents on the allegations that on 20/08/1978, at about10. 30 P. M. in the night, the complainant Suresh Kumar and one Misssushma Chaudhary were going in a car No. BRP 651 towards Jamunabazar within the jurisdiction of P. S. Kashmere Gate, Delhi. Theywere invested by about ten-eleven persons who emerged out of twotaxis and drove them away to a big building on the roadside. Theywere beaten, detained and forced to write some letters and pose forphotographs. The identity of only three abductors could be established. They were, (1) Om Pal Singh, Office Secretary of the All India Kisansammelan, (2) K. C. Tyagi, General Secretary of the Yuva Janata,and (3) A. P. Singh, a Janata (S) worker. The investigation is


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top