SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Del) 365

N.N.GOSWAMY
MUNSHI RAM SAKHUJA – Appellant
Versus
COL. (RETD) RAM PARSHAD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.L.Sachdev, S.L.Bhatia

N. N. Goswamy, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision petition is directed against the judgment of the 5th Additional Rent Controller, Delhi whereby the petition of the landlord under Section 14 (!) (e) read with section 25b of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 was dismissed.

( 2 ) THE petitioner is the landlord of the premises No. N-62, Greater Kailash, New Delhi and the respondent is the tenant of the ground floor of the said premises. The petitioner filed a petition for ejectment under section 14 (l) (e) read with section 25b of the Act on the ground of bona fide requirement. It was pleaded that the premises indispute were let in favour of the respondent in January 1970 for residential purpose only. The present accommodation in possession of the petitioner is insufficient and consists of drawing-cum-dining, two bed rooms, store, kitchen, two toilets and a small varandah on back and front on the first floor besides barasati floor which consists of only one room along with latrine-cum bath. The family of the petitioner consists of himself, his wife, one son who is married, his wife and their child aged about one year, another son aged about 22 years who is also of marriageable age and whose marria









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top