SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(Del) 17

SULTAN SINGH
VICCO LABS – Appellant
Versus
HINDUSTAN RIMMER – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AMARJIT SINGH, ANUP SINGH, N.K.ANAND

Sultan Singh

( 1 ) THIS is an application under 0. 39 R. 1 and 2 Civil Procedure Code in a suit for injunction restraining defendants from using in relation to their product carton tube pertaining to cosmo Turmeric Vanishing Cream and/or any other carton or tube which is deceptively similar to plaintiffs carton and tube pertaining to "vicco Turmeric Vanishing Cream" so as to pass off their goods as the goods of the plaintiffs, for recovery of rupees one lakh as damages and also to deliver up for destruction all designs, blocks, tubes, carton and tube used in manufacture of these deceptively similar to the carton and tube of the plaintiffs.

( 2 ) THE suit was originally filed in the High Court at Bombay 8. 2. 78. Bharucha, J. passed the following order on 27. 7. 1978 : "i am not satified that this Court has Jurisdiction. Therefore, Notice of Motion dismissed. Costs of the notice of Motion to be costs in the cause. "

( 3 ) THE plantiffs then applied for leave to withdraw the suit on the ground of lack of jurisdiction and the following order was passed on 8. 8. 78. "plaint returned for presentation to proper Court. The Plaintiffs to pay to the Defendants the costs fixed at Rs













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top