High Court Of Delhi
J.K.(BOMBAY) LIMITED - Appellant
Versus
CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES - Respondent
Civil 901 of 1975
Decided On : 01/17/1979
INCOME TAX - Section 80-0 - Technical services - Meaning - Whether services of managing agents rendered to a foreign company are technical services - Held, no.
Fact of the Case:
The assessee, an Indian company, entered into agreements with two foreign companies to act as their managing agents. The agreements were submitted to the Central Board of Direct Taxes for approval under section 80-0 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which provides for a deduction from total income in respect of certain payments received from foreign governments or enterprises for the use of technical services. The Board declined to grant approval, holding that the role of the managing agents was primarily to manage and run the plant and not to provide or render technical services.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the services of managing agents rendered to a foreign company are not technical services within the meaning of section 80-0 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court reasoned that the object of section 80-0 is to encourage Indian companies to earn foreign exchange by providing technical services to foreign governments or enterprises, and that the services of managing agents do not fall within this category. The court also noted that the Board has been given the power to approve or refuse to approve agreements under section 80-0, and that the Board's understanding of the meaning of technical services is entitled to considerable weight.
Issues: Whether the services of managing agents rendered to a foreign company are technical services within the meaning of section 80-0 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the services of managing agents rendered to a foreign company are not technical services within the meaning of section 80-0 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court reasoned that the object of section 80-0 is to encourage Indian companies to earn foreign exchange by providing technical services to foreign governments or enterprises, and that the services of managing agents do not fall within this category. The court also noted that the Board has been given the power to approve or refuse to approve agreements under section 80-0, and that the Board's understanding of the meaning of technical services is entitled to considerable weight.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the writ petitions filed by the assessee.
( 1 ) THE question for decision raised by these writ petitions is whether the services of managing agents rendered by an Indian Company to a foreign company are "technical services" within the meaning of section 80-0 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act ). Messrs. J. K. (Bombay) Ltd. , an Indian Company, that is the managing agents, entered into two agreements with two foreign companies, namely, (1) The Raymond Woollen Mills (Kenya) Limited, and (2) Raymond (Mauritius) Limited. As the foreign companies were desirous of setting up Woollen Spinning and Weaving Plants and the managing agents were the managing agents of a woollen mill in India and possessed technical information and expert industrial, A commercial and scientific knowledge, experience and skill with regard to the setting up and working of woollen spinning and weaving plants, the managing agents agreed to act as the managing agents of the foreign companies for certain fixed terms. The managing agents were to be remunerated for their services by payment of 10 per cent of the net profits of the foreign companies. The managing agents were to be responsible for the design, lay-out, engineering and initial operation of the plant, for the detailed specifications of the machinery and the procurement thereof and shall make available to the company all technical information and expert industrial, commercial and scientific knowledge, experience and skill to the foreign company. In short, the managing agents were to run these foreign companies by performing the functions of management. The agreement with the foreign companies were submitted by the managing agents for approval to the Central Board of Direct Taxes. By the impugned orders, dated 17th July, 1974 in the present writ petition and 17th March, 1976 in the connected writ petition (No. 570 of 1976), the Board declined to grant its approval to these agreements. The main reason for rejecting the applications was that the role of the managing agents was primarily to manage and run the plant and not to provide or render technical services or supplying technical information of the nature provided for in Section 80-0 of the Act. The petitions seek quashing of these orders.
( 2 ) SECTION 80-0, which is to be construed is as follows : " (1) Where the gross total income of an assessee, being an Indian company, includes any income by way of royalty, commission, fees or any similar payment received by the assessee from the Government of a foreign State or a foreign enterprise in consideration for the use outside India of any patent, invention, model, design, secret formula or process, or similar property right, or information concerning industrial, commercial or scientific knowledge, experience or skill made available or provided or agreed to be made available or provided to such Government or enterprise by the assessee, or in consideration of technical services rendered or agreed to be rendered outside India to such Government or enterprise by the assessee, under an agreement approved by the Board in this behalf, and such income is received in convertible foreign exchange in India, or having been received in convertible foreign exchange outside Indiaor having been converted into convertible foreign exchange outside India, is brought into India, by or on behalf of the assessee in accordance with any law for the time being in force for regulating payments and dealings in foreign exchange, there shall be allowed, in accordance with and subject to the provisions of this section, a deduction of the whole of the income so received in, or brought into, India in computing the total income of the assessec : Provided that the application for the approval of the agreement referred to in this sub-section is made to the Board before the last day of October of the assessment year in relation to which the approval is first sought : Provided further that approval of the Board shall not be necessary in the case of any such agr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.