( 1 ) THIS is a petition for revision against the order of the Rent Controller dated 18. 9. 1978 granting leave under section 25 B (5) of the Rent control Act but limited to one ground only.

( 2 ) THE respondent/landlord filed an application claiming eviction on the ground of bona fide need. The petitioner/tenant sought leave to defend on various grounds namely about the lack of ownership of the landlord, lack of bonafide need and also denied the relationship of landlord and tenant and also claiming that no notice of termination had been validly served. The Rent Controller found no merit in all the grounds excepting the ground relating to termination of tenancy and granted leave with respect to that ground only. The tenant has come up to this court in revision against that order.

( 3 ) IN restricting the leave to one ground the trial court relied on a decision given by me which is reported as Jiteiidre Verma v. Manohar Lal Aggarwal (1978) (1) RCR 203 ). At the time of admission Mr. Sahai had referred to Smt. Kundan Kaur v. K. P. Verma (1978) (2) R. C. R. 282) and contended that this authority seems to take a contrary view. I have gone through this authority. In that