SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(Del) 144

HARISH CHANDRA, V.S.DESHPANDE
JIJAR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
MAHENDER KAUAR – Respondent


V S. Deshpande and Harish Chandra J.

( 1 ) THIS question referred to the larger Bench is bsiefly whether the affidavit required to be filed under Section 25 B read with the Third Schedule of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (the Act), as amended, shall itself contain the grounds and the facts on the basis of which leave to contest the appliction for civiction is sought or whether the said grounds and facts having been recited in the accompanying application the affidavit may only refer to the statements made in the application and say that these statements are true to the knowledge of the deponent. The question arises in this way.

( 2 ) THE respondent landlady filed an application for the eviction of the appellant tenant under the summary procedure laid down in Chapter IIIA of the Act which includes Section 25 B. The tenant was served with the summons in the form prescribed by the Third Schedule. He made an application for leave to contest the application for eviction and swore an affidavit in which the statements made in the accompanying application were affirmed to be true. The Addl. Controller referred to the following words in the affidavit :

" (1) That the accompanying applicat




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top