SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(Del) 196

AVADH BEHARI ROHATGI
KRISHNA GOODS CARRIERS PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.L.SAIGAL, D.D.Choudhury, H.C.Mac

A. B. Rohatgi, J.

( 1 ) THIS is one of those cases which from time to time raise the question of the responsibility of railway authorities for accidents at level crossings.

( 2 ) ON September 23, 1961 at about 1. 30 a. m. in the night a driver of the plaintiff company was driving a mercedes motortruck. That night he and his friend had been to a circus show at Meerut. They were returning to Delhi in their respective trucks. They were proceedings on the main Meerut Delhi road. It is a busy road with much vehicular traffic. On this road between Meerut city and Kharkhoda railway station there is a manned public level crossing. This level crossing has iron gates on both side of the road. There is a cabin and lodging tor the gateman. The practice of the railway was to close the gates when a train was crossing. A red light signal was also provided to warn the approaching public and vehicles to wait till the train passed.

( 3 ) WHEN the plaintiff s driver reached the railway crossing he found the gates open. There was no danger signal to warn the public of the danger of any approaching train. In fact the friend s truck which was ahead of the plaintiff s truck had safely crossed the line. H



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top