SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(Del) 220

HARISH CHANDRA, RAJINDAR SACHAR
SANGITA SHRIVASTAVA – Appellant
Versus
U. N. SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.SRIVASTAVA, B.B.Kishore, R.DAYAL, R.P.Bansal, V.P.Chaudhary, YOGESHVAR PRASAD

SACHAR, J.

( 1 ) THE Petitioner in this writ petition challenges, the order of the respondent No. 2, University of Delhi, in refusing to allow the petitioner to take the examination of M. A. (P) held in April 1979 This petition was filed on 6th April 1979 and pending the disposal of the petition the petitioner was allowed to appear for the M. A. (P) History examination commencing on 7th April 1979. She has since taken the examination but her result has been withheld to await the decision in the present writ petition.

( 2 ) THE petitioner passed her B. A. (Hons.) History examination in 11978 from Delhi University. She was a. student in Indraprastha College women. She secured 354 marks out of 800 marks equivalent to 44. 25 per cent. For admission to the Post Graduate course candidates desirous of seeking admission to M. A. must fulfil the requisite condition of having passed with prescribed percentage as detailed in the appendix I of the Bulletin of Information. At page 9 of the Bulletin Note 1 provides that rounding of a fraction of marks tor purposes of admission to any course is not permissible and note 2 provides that candidate not fulfilling the eligibility requirements shall no







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top