SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(Del) 249

HARISH CHANDRA, V.S.DESHPANDE
ISHERDAS SAHNI AND BROTHERS – Appellant
Versus
DELHI ADMINISTRATION – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ANIL BHATNAGAR, R.S.NARULA, S.C.Malik Sayeed Uddin, S.K.MAHAJAN, U.K.KHAITAN

V. S. DESHPANDE

( 1 ) THE petitioner herein as also the petitioners in the connected writ petitions are holders of licences to run cinemas under the Cinematograph Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and the Delhi Cinematograph Rules, 1953 (the rules) made thereunder. For some years, the Delhi Administration has been regulating the rates at which cinema tickets could be sold by the holders of the licences for running the cinema theatres in Delhi. In 1975, there was a general cut of 10% in the rates which had been already fixed by the Delhi Administration tor the sale of cinema tickets. The holders of these licences felt aggrieved by the said cut. They made representations to the Delhi Administration pointing out that already the expenses of exhibiting films and maintaining the cinema theatres had gone up for a number of years and the rates which had already been fixed were already proving unbearable and on top of it, the cut of 10% was making it uneconomical for the licensees to run the cinemas. The representation of the National Associaion of Motion Picture Exhibitors was considered by the Lt. Governor and the Administration agreed to allow the licensees to add to the exi


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top