SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(Del) 41

S.RANGANATHAN, T.V.R.TATACHARI
SETH BANARSI DASS GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.Kirpal, C.S.AGARWAL, C.S.VAIDYANATHAN, M.S.P.AGARWAL, MIRA JAGGI

T. V. R. TATACHARI

( 1 ) THIS is a reference made by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench a to this Court under Section 66 (1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ).

( 2 ) THE assessee, a Hindu undivided family of which the Karta is Seth Banarsi Dass Gupta, Meerut, filed two applications R. A. Nos. 945 and 946 of 1968-69, before the Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench a , under Section 66 (1) of the Act, arising Out of the Income-tax Appeals Nos. 1978 and 1979 of 1963-64, relating to the assessment years 1956-57 and 1957-58. Similarly, the Commissioner of Income-tax, Delhi (Central), New Delhi, filed two applications, R. A. Nos. 12 and 13 of 1968-69, arising out of the same Income-tax Appeals Nos. 1978 and 1979 of 1963-64, relating to the assessment years 1956-57 and 195 7-5 8 under Section 66 (1) of the Act.

( 3 ) BY a common order, dated 28th March, 1969. the Appellate Tribunal referred seven questions of law to this Court as arising out of the orders of the Tribunal, dated 2nd March, 1968 in the aforesaid Income-tax Appeals Nos. 1978 and 1979 of 1963-64. The said reference has been numbered in this Court as I. T. R. No. 68 of 1969. Wh





















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top