SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(Del) 51

PRAKASH NARAIN
AKHTAR BEGUM – Appellant
Versus
JAMSHED MUNIR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.T.Singh, D.LATIF, R.P.Bansal

PRAKASH NARAIN, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision petition is directed against an order dated January 21, 1978 passed by Shri S. P. Singh Chaudhary, Guardian Judge, Delhi, dismissing the petitioner s application under Section 12 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890.

( 2 ) THE petitioner and the respondent are Sunni Muslims governed by the Hanafi Law of Sunni Muslims. They were married at Delhi (claimed by the petitioner as her home town) in June, 1954 according to the rites of their personal law. After marriage the parties resided at Aligarh. Two children were born out of the wedlock, a son, named Jahangir, now aged about 12 years and a daughter, named Parah, now aged about 7/8 years. Certain differences are said to have arisen between the petitioner and the respondent with the result that the petitioner came away to Delhi in 1976. Subsequently, Farah also came to stay with her at Delhi. In March/april, 1977, it is said, the petitioner received letters and representations from her son, Jahangir, and others which forced her to send Farah to Aligarh where the respondent is staying. The respondent divorsed the petitioner by a letter dated October 30, 1977. The petitioner claimed the custody of h

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top