SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(Del) 67

F.S.GILL
SHAM LAL – Appellant
Versus
INTERADS ADVERTISING PRIVATE LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.C.GULATI, ANUP SINGH

F. S. GILL

( 1 ) SHRI Sham Lal, plaintiff, has alleged that he is trading as M/s. Anil and Co. since 10th May, 1965 and doing business as manufacturer of artist and paint brushes. Defendant No. 1 is stated to be a Private Limited Company, which has its export division under the name and style of Interads Export Division (defendant No. 2 ).

( 2 ) THE plaintiff has further stated that the brushes, which he manufactures and markets, are affixed with the trade mark anil , depicting a key portion of his trade style; that from the date he had started manufacturing, he has sold brushes valuing about Rs. 6,41,374. 21 and that on account of the superiority of brushes and skill in sale promotion, the brushes affixed with the trade mark anil have achieved recognition and reputation with the trade and the general public. It is further added that the application of the plaintiff for the registration of the trade mark anil in respect of brushes is also pending with the Trade Marks Registry.

( 3 ) IT is further averred that on account of the continuous and extensive user during the last 12 years, the plaintiff s brushes affixed with the trade mark anil are exclusively associated and identif





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top