YOGESHWAR DAYAL
VIJAY KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
MANOHAR LAL – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is a petition for revision under S. 115 of the Civil P. C. against the order of the learned Additional District Judge, Delhi dated 9-2-1978 where by the learned trial court held that S. 1 of the Code is not applicable to the fact of the case but in the exercise of the inherent jurisdiction of the court, the trial court, however, stayed the present suit on the condition that the defendant Nos. 1 to 5 should deposit in court for the period in dispute part of the amount claimed in the present suit @ Rs. 371. 00. per month and should furnish sure bond for the balance amount claimed the suit.
( 2 ) THE present revision petition has been filed on behalf of defendants 1, 2 and 4 and it is contended that on the facts of the case S. 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure was applicable, and, therefore, the trial court should have stayed the suit and had no jurisdiction to impose any conditions while staying the suit.
( 3 ) THE plaintiffs had filed the present suit out of which the present revision arises for the recovery of Rs. 34,200. 00 as arrears of mesne profits for the period 1-4-1974 to 31-3-1977. The mesne profits were claimed @ Rs. 950. 00 per month against the
REFERRED TO : C. P. Srinivasam Pillai v. Chellakumara Gounder
P. S. Kandasami Mudaliar v. T. N. Ranganathan
Fulchand Motilal v. Manhar Lall Jetha Lall Mehta
Life Pharmaceuticals (Private) Ltd. v. Bengal Medical Hall
Jai Hind Iron Mart v. Tulsiram Bhagwandas
Velur Munuswami Mudaliar v. Darwaja Raghupathi
Narikkote Kunnamangalath Ittisseri Kuberan Nambudri v. Pothera Kalloor Roman Nair
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.